Planets’ proper names in Tulu

The early Tulu tribes’ adoption of the names of the planets in our solar system as proper names is another characteristic of their Pirak phase of civilisation, which lasted from approximately 2000 to 500 BC. The group of sages who resided in the northwest of the Indian subcontinent and wrote the Vedas worshipped a number of planets as well as other natural forces. Worship of animals, heroes, and spirits was popular among the Tulu of the present and other tribes of the time. There was started worship of Brahma/Bermer. At that time, astrology was a common practise. According to legend, even Abraham initially used astrology. Several tribes that were there at the time naturally took the names of the planets in the solar system, so it makes sense.

In one of his study papers, Professor Mariappa Bhat made note of how common it is for Tulu people to use names of the Sun and various planets as part of their legitimate names. The names are as follows and match the names of the seven days of the week:

English Sanskrit .>. Tulu*

Sun Aditya Aitha
Moon Soma Soma/Toma
Mars Angaraka Angare
Mercury Budha Booda
Jupiter Guru Guruve
Venus Shukra Tukra
Saturn Shani Taniya
*[Tulu proper names were used with suffixes of –anna,-appa or aiha]

These proper names were once highly valued by Tulu people, but they are currently being abandoned in favour of modernity because they are out of style. Only Aditya, Soma, and Guru are still favoured among the Sanskrit equivalents; the others are all but defunct.
On the succeeding historical eras, the astrological studies in the northwest Indian subcontinent persisted and the fundamental scientific and mathematical ideas were further developed. With Jantar Mantar serving as the primary exhibit of our tradition in astronomical research, astrological study centres have been established in areas of the Indian subcontinent like Jaipur and Delhi.

The Tulu people’s use of these recently extinct planetary names is a testament to their ancient past, which dates to around 500 BC to 2000 BC.

Horse-mounted heroes in ancient spirit worship

Many people believe that ghost worship is exclusively practised in coastal Tulunad (also known as “Bhutrdhane”) and Kerala (also known as “Teyyam”). The continuance and development of the spirit religion into a complex art form in these areas contributes to the perception.
The early historical societies were rife with the primordial cult of worshipping the spirits of their deceased mass heroes under the preposterous notion that powerful souls live on after death. One of the first spirits to be worshipped in the early civilizations between 2000 and 500 BC was the spirit of Brahma, which was drawn from the folk hero Abraham.Around 500 BC, migrant Tulu tribes and their allies brought the Bermer (Brahma) cult from the northwest Indian subcontinent to the Karavali (coastal Karnataka), which would later become their homeland, the Tulunadu. The Tulu Bermer was initially pictured as a horse-riding hero, most likely one with a beard like Abraham. Halakki and other tribes of the Uttara Kannada district kept Bommayya (also known as Brahma) in the same horse-riding hero role. The early Tulu tribes’ migration path passes via the Uttara Kannada region.

Riding a horse comes to mind The figure of Bermer was used to represent several later-added spirits of that era. Bermer was a dominant religion and notion for several succeeding centuries. In the area, there was still spirit worship.In the early centuries of the Christian era, spirit worship was common in southern India. The Deccan region’s Khandoba and Mallanna are ghosts from that era. The pictures of the horse-riding heroes portrayed these spirits.

Khandoba is a legendary spirit god who was first revered in Maharastra by shepherds and hunters. The folk deity or spirit is also referred to as Malhari Martand, Khanderao, and Khanderaya. The comparable spirit is known as Mallanna in Andhra Pradesh, and he has also gone by the names Mallappa, Mallaya, Mallara, and Mailara Linga in Karnataka. Khandoba, Khanderao, or Mallappa’s initial representation was that of a hero galloping on a horse (or a bull as a later modification).

A possible 5th century AD hero turned spirit named Mundittaya is also shown in Tulunadu as a horse-riding spirit. It’s possible that Mundittaya represents a hero from the Munda tribe that ruled the coastal region in early historical times.
Between the 6th and 10th centuries AD, Shiva worship rose to prominence, and during this time, the Kandoba/Mallappa ghost was reinterpreted as Mrtanda Bhairava, a Shiva manifestation. A lingam was used to represent Mailara Linga.

It appears that Dravidian tribes who came to southern India and lived in the present-day Tamilnad, likely between the years 500 and 100 BC, also brought the Shiva religion or Shaivism to that region.

Vishnu took ten different forms.

A unified model of incarnations was created by combining several ancient theological systems and beliefs that were widespread in northern Indian civilization at that point in history (around 300 BC or later). The idea of the ten avatras of Lord Vishnu was created by recomposing and uniting the 10 divinities created by earlier civilisation sects. The phrases ava (meaning downhill) and tra (meaning passage) relate to God’s fall into earth in the shapes of humans and animals. These consist of:

1. Matsya -The fish God
2 Koorma-The Tortoise
3. Varāha-The Boar
4. Narasimha- The Lion Man
5. Vāmana-The Dwarf
6. Parashurāma-The Axe Rama
7. Rāma
8. Krishna
9. Balarām/ Buddha and
10. Kalki.

All of these incarnations are essentially the acceptance and mythification of ten different religions that were prevalent throughout various stages of the Indian subcontinent’s civilisation.
The stories are also roughly, and possibly unintentionally, ordered according to the stages of life’s evolution, starting with the most basic vertebrate fish and ending with the most advanced humans.

  1. The recognition of “Matsya,” or The Fish God, as an avatar clarifies one of the main disagreements surrounding the interpretation of Indus Valley civilisation. There are several fish pictograms on the seals discovered in Indus valley civilization archaeological sites like Harapa and Mohenjodaro. Iravattam Mahadevan believed that these fish symbols represented stars (based on the fact that the term “meen” has two meanings in Dravidian languages), but Asko Parpola insisted that they stand for the Fish God who was worshipped by the people of the Indus valley. It seems that Asko Parpola’s interpretation is more appropriate.Long after the Indus valley civilisation was destroyed, people’s thoughts were still preoccupied with the idea of the Fish God that the Indus valley inhabitants (mostly Dravidians?) worshipped. Later in history, Vaishnavism (the Vishnu cult) accepted the same idea or myth as Matsya avatr, the first manifestation of Lord Vishnu.
  2. On the occasion of the mythical churning of the Sea (Samudra mathana) for the purpose of getting the amrutha, the Giant Tortoise, known as the Koorma avatr, is recalled. This legend’s depiction of the conflict between the Sura (divine beings) and Asura (demons) groups is an exaggerated portrayal of the process of churning buttermilk to make butter. Dairy farming and cattle grazing were common during the subcontinent’s early history. Even Krishna came from a cattle keeping household (Yadavs). The Mount of Meru is pictured in the mythical account as the churning rope being pulled in a tug of war mode by Sura and Asura groups on opposite ends, while Mount Meru is positioned on the Koorma as the churning rod tied with Adishesha (the serpent associated with Vishnu).Instead of using a buttermilk pot, the entire churning process is carried out in the sea, and “amrutha” (the elixir) is sought after from this churning rather than butter. The entire mythological imagination exalts the rivalry and hostility between the Vedic Aryan and Jewish tribes, whose cultures developed at the same time and in parallel ways.
  3. Similar to this, the Great Boar was revered during the early historical era in the northwest subcontinent. This tale must have originated from the Boar spirit-god (‘daiva’) ‘Panjurli’ worshipped by Tulu tribes. The Boar God (Varaha), according to the myth of the ten incarnations, slew Hiranyaksha, the brother of Hiranyakashipu, and saved the Earth from the fury of the sea.
  4. The Narasimha (also known as the Lion-man or the half-man, half-lion avatr) tells the tale of Prahlada, an innocent youngster who was saved from the hands of his oppressive father Hiranyakashipu, but it also has a lot of fantastical elements. According to tradition, the brothers of the Asura, Hiranyakashipu and Hiranyaksha, were born to the sage Kashyapa, the descendant of Lord Brahma. Diti, Aditi, Vinita, and Kudroo were the names of the four wives of Sage Kashyapa. Sisters of Gauri, Lord Shiva’s wife, were Diti and Aditi. Diti gave birth to Hiranyakashipu and Hiranyaksha. Aditi gave birth to the Sura class of deities. Garuda (the Eagle), the bearer of Vishnu, was created by Vinita. Nagas, the serpent class, were created by Kudroo. The worship of the Naga has been popular since the dawn of civilisation.The Garuda (eagle) notion is intriguing in and of itself. Prophet Abraham was riding a horse as he was on the move. The original Brahma, who sprung from Abraham, rode a horse. (However, throughout time, the Brahma’s configuration evolved.) It later became customary to show all Gods as having speedy carrying animals, which were the only vehicles available at the period, in the manner of the original Brahma. The eagle also kills snakes, incidentally. Garuda was thus chosen by the myth’s authors as Vishnu’s chariot, maybe also to challenge the dominance of the Naga worship.These narratives exhibit the confluence of numerous mythology. These imaginations theologically explained the origins of Gods (Sura class), Demons (Asura class), Naga class, and Garuda.From Diti comes the term “daitya” (which means “giant”). It seems that the daityas (the Asura class) had enormous builds, which may have been a reference to the tall Caucasian race.
  5. The tale of the dwarf Vamana is a bit bizarre. It showed how a dwarf’s naughty request to build three steps on the land was glorified, and how he successfully conquered the just King Bali, who was well-liked and respected by his citizens. Even after King Bali was defeated by “Patala,” he was still revered by his subjects. Since ancient times, Tulu and Malayali people have celebrated a special night of lights at Deepavali in memory of King Baliyendra. In terms of natural justice, King Bali had no wrongdoing other than the fact that he belonged to the so-called Asura class
  6. .A determined and strong man named Parashurama slew numerous Kshatriya kings to exact revenge for the insult committed against his family. This man was given the name Parashu-ram to distinguish him from the Rama of the Ramayana, with the word “parashu” denoting the axe he carried as a weapon.The Par ashram in Konkan Karavali and Malabar on India’s West Coast is associated with the actual myth that he took back the coastal area from the Lord of the Sea. He made a pact with the (Arabian) Sea that the Sea would give up any land up to where he could throw his axe. This is an intriguing tale of the Sea’s retreat that is credited to a fictional superhuman figure.Regression and transgression of the seas are phenomena that have happened historically all across the world. Geologists estimate that the West Coast’s most recent regression was roughly 6000 years ago. People who were alive during the Regression of the Sea experienced the astonishing phenomena, and the tale was passed down orally from elder to younger generations. After a few generations, the hero Parashurama was given credit for the tale because people believed he could accomplish such a thing with the help of his incredible axe.
  7. Rama’s tale may be a prehistoric, pre-Vedic folktale that has been passed down through the centuries from older to younger family members. The presence of primal humans or monkeys (apes or hairy men who resemble apes) places the discovery in prehistoric times. The tale was repackaged by Valmiki, a hunter turned poet who lived between 500 and 800 BC, and was given a light fantastical touch. When the Ramayana was rewritten, the idea of Brahma had already evolved from a primitive horse-riding tribal hero based on Abraham’s life (Tulu Brahma: the Bermer) to a four-headed God of creation. According to S.S. N. Murthy’s in-depth analysis, Brahma was extolled and transformed into a mythical vision of magnificence.He was also shown as a god with ten heads. It’s fascinating to see how extensively the Ramayana describes the landscape of southern India and Sri Lanka. These sites must have allowed for unrestricted foot traffic at the time.
  8. The Krishna, who has gained popularity since his youth, was once more a common hero. According to S.S.N.Murthy and others, the Mahabharata epic is a wildly imaginative canvas of explosions and fancies based on a real late to post-Vedic conflict of ten kingdoms.Both Rama and Krishna are praised for having blue skin, which is a compliment to the pleasantly dark-skinned Gods. There were light-skinned people in that era, as indicated by the focus on “blue skin.” It also suggests that Rama and Krishna came from the period’s dark-skinned indigenous.
  9. Balarm, Krishna’s brother, was initially thought of as one of the incarnations but was later substituted by Buddha, who was more well-liked at the time the idea of the 10 incarnations was put together.
  10. If bad continues to rule the earth, Kalki, the futuristic fantasy of the ten incarnations, hopes that God will return to correct the world. It was a vacant position set aside for the unseen mass Hero of the future.The Balaram-Buddha alterations imply that the list of incarnations was put together while Buddhism was at its height and at the time of Buddha.I’ve outlined a crude examination of the sociological development and evolution of theological ideas in our nation. Please see Guru Vishwanath’s blog articles from August to September 2005 for theological documentation on the ten incarnations of Vishnu.Initially, at least from around 500 BC, spirit worship predominated in Tulunadu and Kerala, and it still does so now. After the fifth century AD, Kadamba Kings, who had power over the local Alupa chieftains, built Shiva and Ganesha temples. The Pallava Kings may have had an influence on the Kadamba Kings’ adherence to the Shiva religion.The Krishna cult had already reached Kerala and Tulunadu by the time of Acharya Shankara (about 9th century AD). The Krishna was the deity in Shankara’s family, according to mythology. The Krishna cult was further popularised along the West Coast during the 12th century by Madhvacharya of Udupi.

Brahma. Vishnu. Mahesh.

For sociological studies, the historical development of theological ideas and the pantheon on the Indian subcontinent is highly fascinating. Native Indian societies held a strong belief in the reproductive organs’ exceptional abilities. As a result, both male and female sexual organs were venerated ritually. Later, the Shaiva cult incorporated the phallus (Linga) worship, and the Linga came to stand for Shiva. The ancient cults of vulva (Yoni) worship and Mother Godess worship merged with Shakti/Devi worship along similar lines.
The most ancient important deity in this subcontinent was undoubtedly Brahma. Up until that point, Vedic Aryans worshipped a variety of natural elements as Indra, Agni, Marut, Mitra, Varuna, etc.

The story of Abraham, the great Jewish leader who is also credited with helping his father build the Kaaba in Mecca, was so popular in the area that after his passing, several villages turned to worshipping his ghost. The Brahma tale was originally assimilated by the Tulu people in northwest India, and they carried the ideas with them when they later went south. These remnants of early Brahma worship may still be seen in coastal Karavali Karnataka. The concepts were also carried by the other migrants, but as the idea of Brahma evolved over time, so did these concepts. It appears that Brahma was also adopted by ancient Jainism.

The gods of nature were degraded to minor or lesser gods with the ascendance of the notion of Brahma. Brahma, who was originally depicted as a bearded, horse-riding hero, gradually changed into a four-headed creator, with the four heads standing in for the four Vedas. In the Ramayana, Brahma’s ten heads are also featured. To enhance the prestige and power of the holy elements at a popular level, myths and fiction were added along with intricate poetic imaginations and fancies.

Shiva and Vishnu gained popularity at the same time among the various cultural groups that made up the Indian culture at the time. Similar to Brahma, it’s possible that the initial stories and personas of Shiva and Vishnu were based on the real-life exploits of remarkable common heroes from that era. Interestingly, despite having dark or black complexion like their locals at the time, both of these Gods were poetically referred to as having “blue skin” (Shyamala Varna). These were dark-skinned Dravida/Munda tribal Gods, as evidenced by their black skin.

When the Vedic Aryans left their homes and entered the realms of several regional monarchs, they were forced to work for the Dravida/Munda kings in order to support themselves. Dravida/Munda Kings who trusted in their dark-skinned heroes went to gods rather than the white-skinned bearded Brahma or other Vedic deities (derived from Abraham). Due to their understanding of the Vedas, the Vedic Aryans who later became Brahmins were forced to abandon the Vedic Gods in favour of native deities with dark skin, such as Vishnu and Shiva (Mahesh).

The three trilinear faiths were attempted to be combined into a single concept of trinities at some point in history, especially after witnessing the development of the three lines of divine concepts. Brahma (the creator), Vishnu (the keeper), and Maheswara (the destroyer) were combined into the trinity. An illustration of this acceptance of the blending of three faiths are the well-known Trimurthy statues found in Mumbai’s Elephanta caves.

It’s remarkable that these Gods, particularly the later-evolved four-headed Brahma, the Vishnu, and the Shiva, did not initially have an impact on the Tulu and Malayali people. Tamils who had settled in Madurai worshipped Shiva at least as early as the Christian era (Sangam literatuire period).
When the Kadamba dynasty at Banavasi came to power in the fifth century AD, Shiva temples were first built in Tulunad. The notions of Vishnu and Krishna also arrived in Tulunad much later.

Origins of worshipping animals and spirits

Since countless years ago, there have been conflicting claims about the existence, nature, and form of God. But those who have placed their faith in a form of God have been successful in their missions throughout history because of the strength of their faith. Thus, it is crucial to practise positive thinking in your worship and to have trust and belief in it. As far as the objective is concerned, God’s precise character or form is unimportant. In the early stages of the long evolutions of human civilization, men worshipped animal gods and their spirits. They then began to worship heroes, and then Gods who took on human form. In the end, these evolutionary tendencies gave rise to the idea of a formless God.

Boar:Panjurli
Animal worship was the first type of worship practised by humans in the Indian subcontinent, followed by spirit worship. Their primary concern was protecting crops from wild boars when early nomadic tribal people turned to agriculture and built habitations and colonies around their agricultural fields (6000 to 4000 BC). In the beginning, they were unable to control them or anticipate their strikes. They most likely also believed that these boars have a god that rules over them and hoped that by worshipping this god of the boars, they would be free from the bothersome boars. It appears that this is how early, primitive cultures started to worship pigs. The Tulu tribes’ “Panjurli” bhoota or “daiva” was known as the wild boar god.

Animal spirits are referred to as “bhoota” in this context. “Daiva” is a name for God. Various spirits were given heavenly rank (also known as “daiva”) by early societies, such as the primordial Tulu tribes. The early societies had the belief that even after death, all living things continue to exist as spirits. As a result, the idea of reincarnation was created.

Serpent:Naga
The serpent or cobra was a similar enigmatic creature that occasionally bit one of their members fatally and appeared suddenly around their settlements. Sometimes, for reasons that were unknown to them at the time, it did not bite. They were astounded by the snakes’ enigmatic ability to kill people with just one lethal bite. In the prehistoric tribal societies of the Indian subcontinent, this gave rise to the concept of serpent or Naga worship.
Both of these religions (Panjurli and Naga) were eventually incorporated into the pantheon of Indian deities. The early tribes’ renowned boar, Panjurli, evolved into Varaha, Vishnu’s third avatar.Naga worship was assimilated into Adishesha, the poetic mattress and apron for the reclining Vishnu, and the serpent around Shiva’s neck. In several locations in southern India, Murugan or Subramanya worship has since blended with Naga worship. With the migration of the Tulu tribes, the idea of Panjurli and Naga worship was brought from the northwest Indian subcontinent to Tulunad, where it is still practised today. The number of Spirit Gods has expanded throughout the course of the lengthy historical past, and individual Tulu families have long had a belief in particular ghosts. Even individuals who later adopted the worship of important Hindu deities like Shiva, Vishnu, Krishna, and Shakti, or even Jainism, continue to fervently revere the spirits passed down via their families.

Fish God
In a similar line, it appears that the fish images seen on Indus Valley seals stand in for the Fish God, who was revered by the locals. The Indus and its tributaries’ frequent floods greatly alarmed the residents of the Indus valley. They may have had faith in the Fish God, who rules the rivers and the sea, to prevent floods. Long after the Indus Valley was destroyed, the memories of the Fish God civilisation persisted. The account was later incorporated into history as Vishnu’s original incarnation.
The bull or bison is yet another animal depiction that can be seen on Indus seals. The bull was then chosen as Shiva’s mode of transportation.

Tulu tribes – Migration from Pirak : 1000-600 BC

The Tulu identity and civilization as it exists today in Tulunad is a composite culture that has evolved over the last four thousand years. Several individual cultural streams have merged with the Tulu culture at various times throughout the long historical past, much like numerous rivers and streams flow into the sea. The contribution of Tulu tribes that migrated to this Tulunad in the distant historical past dating back to the period 1000 to 600 years BC is one of the recognisable major events in the evolution of Tulu language and culture.[I quote a broad period of 400 years – that is, from 1000 to 600 BC – because I am unable to sharpen it further at this time. We hope to be able to narrow down this period with the availability of more historical data.]

According to Iravattam Mahadevan, the Indus Valley civilization was an early form of Dravidian culture. Prior to the arrival of the Aryans, Dravidians apparently moved out of the Indus valley region and lived in the north and northwest parts of the Indian subcontinent after the decline of the Indus valley civilization, possibly due to river migration and abrupt floods around 1900 BC. Brahui, a Dravidian language that is still spoken in Baluchistan, parts of Iran, and neighbouring areas, is evidence of the presence of Dravidians in those areas.

Tulu and other Dravidian tribes were among those who lived in the northwestern part of the Indian subcontinent around Pirak, Mehrgarh, Multan, and surrounding areas (now part of Pakistan) between 1900 and 1500 BC. Aryans migrated from Indo-European homelands and composed the famous Vedas, initially in the oral tradition prevalent at the time.

At least four lines of evidence suggest that Tulu tribes were among the groups of settlers in this area during the time period mentioned above:

1. The presence of distinct Tulu words in the Rigveda, such as okha, aaNi, pala/ pela, and so on. Michael Witzel considers the cited words to be words borrowed into early Sanskrit because they do not conform to the linguistic word structure of the Indo-European language in which the Vedas were composed. The Rigveda, in its original oral form, has been dated between 1700 and 1500 BC. There could be more such words, such as the suffix -aaN in braahmaN. 

2. The incorporation of Abraham’s legend into Tulu tradition as Bermer (Brahma) in his original form as a horse-mounted hero.

Abraham, a popular leader of the masses (legendary prophet for Jews, Christians, and Muslims), lived around 2000 BC in the region of the NW Indian subcontinent-Asia Minor-Central Asia. In the tradition of spirit worship, after his death, he became the “Bermer(u)” for Tulu tribes. The Abraham legend was transformed by Vedic Aryans into the Brahman, the supreme cosmic creative power. Brahman gradually evolved into the God Brahma with ten or four heads in various Purana epics by the time the Ramayana was written around 800-500 BC. SSN Murthy examined Lord Brahma’s dominance in the Ramayana in depth.

Because Tulu tribes brought their original horse-mounted “Bermer” image with them to Tulunad before the evolution of the Brahma concept into a ten or four-headed God of creation, the time of Tulu tribe migration in northern India can be fixed as pre 500 BC. 

3. The presence of numerous Prakrit words in Tulu language reflects their heritage from their former homeland in the Northwest Indian subcontinent. The word Pirak, in particular, is intriguing. In Tulu, “Pirak” means “anything related to the distant past.” Pirak, by the way, was the site of early civilization between 1700 and 800 BC. 

4. The basic “moolasthana” (literally, “primary inhabitation” or “original homeland”) concept of Tulu tribes settled in Karavali Tulunad homeland is derived from the tribes’ original concept in their former homeland of the northwest Indian subcontinent. Multan is still a town in Pakistan’s Punjab province. Multan has a temple dedicated to Prahlada. The legends of Prahlada, Hiranyakashipu, and Narahari may have originated here. In addition, as Manjunath pointed out, Prahlada is the grandfather of King Bali (also known as Baliyendra), who has been revered by Tulu and Malayali people since ancient times.

Multan and Moolasthana

Kedarnath Pande (1893-1963), the multi-talented great scholar (“Mahapandit”) Indologist, multilinguist (he knew thirteen languages), and widely travelled, was born as a bhumihar Brahmin on April 9, 1893, in Pandah village, Azamgarh district, Uttar Pradesh. He was fluent in Sanskrit, Hindi, and its various dialects such as Bhojpuri.

Malavi, Avadhi, Maithilli, Braj, Rajasthani, and Nepali are all dialects. He studied the Pali and Sinhalese languages and read original Buddhist texts. He converted to Buddhism and took the name “Rahul Sankrityayan.” Rahul was Buddha’s son’s name, and’sankrityayan’ means “assimilator.”

“Volga se Ganga” (Original in Hindi, also translated as “Volga Ganga”) is one of his best works, tracing the migration and evolution of Indian people from 6000 BC to the present.

Multan is one of the locations mentioned in his book Volga se Ganga.

Multan is now a city and district headquarters in Pakistan’s Punjab province. Multan is a shortened version of the Sanskrit name “moolasthan,” which means “original inhabitation.”

The original settlers of the ancestral Indian subcontinent in this area referred to it as moolasthan (also spelled “mlsthan” or “mlstan”). In Prakrit, the word tan or than was used. It has been absorbed into Marathi and Kannada languages as “thana” or “thane” by migrating ancestral Indians.

The moolasthan concept was carried by migrant Tulu tribes from their original homeland of the northwestern Indian subcontinent (now part of Pakistan) to their subsequent homeland, Tulunad in the Karavali of Karnataka. Moolasthanas are the early settlements of Tulu tribes in Karavali (coastal Karantaka). 

The Rice: Vrihi and Arih

Rice grain relics recovered from archaeological sites in Pirak, Baluchistan, indicate that the area was known for rice cultivation around 1700 BC. The mixed civilization at the time was composed of Vedic scholars and proto-Tulu, proto-Tamil, and Dravidian communities at Pirak, as discussed in previous posts here.

The origin of the Sanskrit word ‘Vrihi,’ which means rice (Oriza sativa) and occasionally other cereals such as wheat and barley, has been debated by Indological experts such as Asko Purpola. The word is said to be unrelated to or influenced by the Dravidian words ‘arih’ (Tulu) and ‘arisi’ (Tamil) that represent rice. On the other hand, it is widely accepted that the Tamil word ‘arisi’ was adopted as ‘rice’ by Greek, Latin, and English.

According to Sankaran Nair (2003), ‘Vrihi’ is a shortened form of the word ‘varahi.’ He stated that several rice varieties such as Graishmic, Hemanti, Varshic, Sharada, Salini, and others are described in ancient Sanskrit texts. Varahi is the female incarnation of Lord Vishnu’s boar incarnation, Varaha. (The name Varahi also refers to a river in Western Karnataka.)

The term ‘Varahi’ has additional meanings. The first connotation is that the Varaha was worshipped at the time by the communities and cultures that existed in the Pirak area. Even today, spirits worshipped by Tulu communities include ‘Panjurli,’ the Tulu form of Varaha. Apparently, the Panjurli or Varaha was more widely worshipped at the time. Later in history, the Varaha concept was absorbed as one of Lord Vishnu’s ten incarnations.

As rice was primarily grown and consumed by those who worshipped the Varaha or Panjurli, the word ‘vrihi’ may have entered Sanskrit usage. Furthermore, there is some similarity in the pronunciation of the words ‘vrihi’ and ‘arih’.

The Brahma’s Importance

One well-wisher who read my post on Brahma pointed out that I made a mistake by equating Brahma with Brhman (pronounced ‘BraahmaN’).

I did not equate the two, but rather stated that the word Brahma inspired the word BraahmaN. The latter term came to stand for “the one who knew about Brahma.” The term ‘Brahma’ or ‘Brahman’ (pronounced ‘brahman’) in this context referred to the refined theological / metaphysical and esoteric concept of Brahma, the cosmic power that created the universe as well as the supreme power that pervades the universe. As a result, the word ‘brahma’ came to mean large and gigantic (‘bruhat’). Words like Brahmanda (literally “the gigantic egg” =universe), brahma-rakshsha, brahma-ratha, naga-brahma, and so on became common.

My goal in reconstructing the original legend and expanding on the concept of Brahma is to understand the historical and sociological evolution of our religious beliefs. I’m not going to go into detail about the theological aspects that are fairly well known because they’ve already been covered extensively by others.

Abraham, a historical hero and mass leader who claimed to be the creator of tribes, became a legend both during his lifetime and after his death. He is mentioned in the Bible and is revered by Jews as a leader and by Muslims as a prophet (Ibrahim). The Vedic scholars acknowledged him as the ultimate cosmic power and the creator. The Abraham/Brahma legend spread throughout the connected geographical region of West Asia-Asia Minor-and Central Asia.

Despite the fact that both communities shared many common concepts and beliefs, the Vedic people and contemporaneous Jews had a deep rivalry. Whatever words began with the letter A were used by Jews, the Vedics used without the initial A. (It could also be the other way around.) As a result, Ahura or Asura for Jews became Sura for Vedics. (Recall the Puranic legends about the Sura-Asura wars.) Veda evolved from Avesta. Abraham was renamed Brahma, and so on.

Some more thoughts on the word ‘braahmaN’: The word is made up of the words ‘brahma + aN.’ The word ‘aaN’ is a Tulu word that means “male.” In Tulu, AaN+ jovu (literally’male being’) refers to man. Surprisingly, the word ‘jovu,’ which is now used in Brahmin Tulu to refer to a girl child, is related to the Sanskrit word ‘jeeva.’

The word ‘aaN’ appears to have been borrowed into early Sanskrit from Tulu, as have some of the other words discussed in previous postings. As a result, the term braahmaN originally referred to a young male who studied scriptures pertaining to the knowledge of Brahma, the cosmic power. Prof Michael Witzel may be able to shed more light on the status of the suffix/word ‘aaN’ in Brahman, as well as the conversion of ‘jovu’ to ‘jeeva’ or vice versa.

Overall, these discussions support my theory that at least some Tulu ancestors lived in the Pirak civilised habitation in Sind, Baluchistan, during the early historical period when the Vedas were composed. Tulu ancestors who migrated brought Brahma worship in the form of ‘Bermer(u)’ to Tulunad, their subsequent homeland.

Tulu Bermer (Brahma) resembled the original form of Abraham, the horse-riding hero. In some ways, these Tulu ancestors were following the ancient cult of hero worship, which evolved into spirit worship after Abraham’s death. The cults of hero worship (for example, Koti-Chennaya, Kanthabare-Boodabare, etc.) and spirit worship (for example, Panjurli, Kalurti, Kodamanthaya, etc.) have persisted in Tulu culture to this day.

On second thought, it appears that the cult of Brahma worship was more widespread in India prior to the ascension and dominance of Shaivism. Migrating other Dravidian ancestors, such as Kannada and Tamil, carried the Brahma cult to different parts of southern India, as evidenced by relics of Brahma temples and Brahma name tags such as Brahmaiah, Bommaya, Brahmasandra, and so on. Many aspects of the Brahma cult were absorbed by Jainism.

As a result, the legend of Brahma bears witness to the evolution and transition of our theological faiths from primitive hero/spirit worship to the concept of abstract cosmic powers at higher philosophic metaphysical levels on the one hand and Hindu Gods in human forms on the other.

The Sweet Potato

Since early historical times, the sweet potato (botanical name: Ipomea batatas) has been a humble food of the masses. During the early period of Indian history, Rama, the dark-skinned prince of Ayodhya, went to live in the forest for fourteen years with his wife Sita and brother Laxmana, only to fulfil a promise made by his father Dasharatha to his wife (Rama’s step mother Kaikei). In the forest, Rama and his companions had to eat roots and tubers like sweet potatoes as well as wild fruits. Sweet potato is a common root that can be eaten both raw and cooked.

According to legend, the Portuguese brought sweet potato (see, Manjunath) to India five centuries ago, along with chilies, beans, potato, cassava, breadfruit, sunflower, groundnut, pineapple, guava, sapota, passion fruit, cashew, tobacco, onion, garlic, and other foods. Sweet potato is said to have been present on the American continents for 5000 years. Archeological evidence suggests that it was cultivated in South America around 2400 BC, and Columbus is said to have discovered it in the Caribbean region around 1502.

Balasubramanian, a reader who commented on Manjunath’s cited post on imported vegetables, elucidated an interesting custom of Tamil Brahmins using native vegetables and materials in shraddha ceremonies. Sweet potatoes are one of the acceptable tubers used in the preparation of ceremonial food, indicating that they have been native to our land for a long time. Bitter gourd, raw bananas, banana stem, colocasia, snake gourd, cluster beans, local cucumber, sweet potato, ginger, raw mango, and black pepper are among the ingredients. Similarly, on the uttarakriya day, Tulu households use specific vegetables and other materials for meal preparation.Raw bananas, ash gourds, and the inner part of the plantain (banana) stem are the essential vegetables for obituary ceremonies in Tulu families, though modernization has tacitly replaced some of the traditionally accepted items in the menu with currently popular ‘desi’ items (like chillies for black pepper). These obituary traditions appear to be quite ancient, and more research into the nature and evolution of our traditional ceremonies is desirable.
Balasubramanian differentiates between ‘valli kizhangu’ (sweet potato) and’mara kizhangu’ (cassava). Cassava (tapioca) is also known as’mara kireng’ in Tulu, where’mara’ (= tree) refers to the cassava shrub. The Tamil word sarkarai valli kizhangu, on the other hand, is a clear translation of sweet ‘vine tuber’ inspired by the imported name sweet potato.

Aside from its emphasised nativity to the American continents, the sweet potato is grown in a variety of places, including Polynesia, New Zealand, and China. It is known as ‘Kumara’ in Polynesia, New Zealand, and Peru. The similarity between Kumara and the Sanskrit word may be coincidental. However, linguistics such as Michael Witzel believe that the word ‘Kumara’ in the Rigveda, written in Indo-Aryan (early Sanskrit), is an extraneous word borrowed from an unknown language. It is still unknown how the sweet potato spread to different continents.

The sweet potato’s Tulu and Tamil names are intriguing. In Tulu, it is spelled ‘kireng’ (also spelled ‘kileng’ and other variants), and in Tamil, it is spelled ‘kilang’ (or with slightly different but allied pronunciation like kizhangu). Both words have the same meaning: keeL or keer = lower or underground; ang=part. The nomenclature is entirely unique and not based on the imported name of sweet potato. The names of the majority of imported vegetables and fruits are similar to or derived from their foreign names. The Malayalam word ‘kiraNNu’ is related to words in Tulu and Tamil. However, the sweet potato is known as ‘genasu’ in Kannada and Telugu.Apart from the kempu kireng (=red sweet potato), boldu kireng (=white sweet potato), and mara kireng (=cassava), Tulu Nighantu (=dictionary) mentions several related species of sweet potatoes, including: Tuppe kireng, koLLi kireng, guddoli kireng, toonNa kireng, pottel kireng, muLLu kireng. I’ve seen tuppe kireng, a short tuber variety named after tuppa, the butter. MuLLu (=spines) kireng is a kireng with spines. Other species may still exist in our rural areas, and our botanists should investigate these research possibilities. The Portuguese could not have brought all of these tubers, some of which were rare and vanishing species. Tribals in India continue to eat a variety of tubers. Many of these tubers may have been present on our land for millennia.

The similarity of Tulu and Tamil words for sweet potato (or related tuber) suggests that the tuber is ancient. The borrowing of Tulu/Tamil words in the Rigveda suggests that proto-Tulu and proto-Tamil tribes coexisted in early Vedic times (ca. 1500 to 500BC). (Please see previous postings, No.26.) The mention of edible tubers in the Ramayana (circa 500-200 BC) only adds to this theory.

Other agricultural crops face similar challenges. For example, peanut (groundnut) is also considered an American native, but it has been cultivated in China since 1500 BC. The antiquity of agricultural crops suggests that many of them are at least as old as our civilization. For example, how can the nativity of a now-ubiquitous plant like coconut be improved? Coconut (Cocos nucifera) has been found on Earth since the Miocene epoch, approximately 20 million years ago, i.e. long before man appeared on this planet.

The nativity of sweet potatoes and other agricultural crops in South America has been asserted based on extensive archaeological and paleobotanical studies conducted in the Americas. Similar studies in the Indian context would be extremely beneficial for a better understanding of our past.

 

Please be aware that certain individuals might approach you by falsely presenting themselves as our Tuluva Team Member, affiliates, agents or representatives. Under this false presence, they may try to gain access to your personal information or any other confidential/valuable information and thereby extort money from you or other valuables from you by offering fictitious opportunities or by claiming that they are contacting you on our behalf. The said individual or organization may also by false representation assure you that they will match up with an ideal family/partner if you pay them a certain sum of money. Such fraudulent offers and claims are usually received via email, the internet, text message, phone, etc. These claims and offers are fraudulent and invalid and you are strongly advised to exercise greater caution when you receive such an offer  or notice. Be well informed of such scams.

We hereby list out some of the features such an offer or claim may have:

  • It may include a phone or instant message for suitable match up
  • Fees or Other charges may be requested to act upon/take further action
  • You may be requested to disclose private, sensitive or confidential information
  • You may be told that you were contacted in such a manner because it is a matter of urgency

Such an offer or claim will probably be in the form of an email sent from a fake email address or from a free email provider such as Gmail, Yahoo, Hotmail, Outlook, etc., and not from an official Tuluva’s email address. (Official mail :bpci@tuluva.in ) Please take extra caution while dealing with such a sham email address, as the perpetrators may misspell our official email address and use a slightly modified version of the said email address.

We reserve all the rights to take legal action against any such claims which may arise from such fraudulent actions, before appropriate legal authority / forum. Accordingly, we request you to immediately get in touch with us via  email at bpci@tuluva.in upon receiving any such suspicious offer or claim and in addition also notify the police or other competent authority.

In all such cases, please dont pay heed to any of the written or oral requests for such an offer that you believe is or might be fraudulent or suspicious. Please note that under no circumstances Tuluva  shall be held liable or responsible for any claims, losses, damages, expenses or other inconvenience resulting from or in any way connected to the actions of these imposters.

Tuluva is committed to provide you with a safe & secure platform. Despite all we do to make the platform secure, we advise some precautions while using our sites and apps:

  1. If a user appears to have entered false, incorrect information about themself, their education, profession, family etc., mark such profiles as Report Us and refrain from contacting that user.
  2. If a user asks for personal favors like transportation of goods, deposit of funds on their behalf, lend them some money etc., immediately cease the communication with the said user and report the said profile.
  3. Be cautious of fake or copy sites which may look similar but are actually owned by people who may have malicious intent. Many sites have a similar appearance as Tuluva but they are not in any way related or affiliated to Tuluva. Please check the URL of the site (www.tuluva.in)
  4. Representatives from these fake sites may reach out to you to get membership fees or for registering your profiles. Exercise caution and alert our customer service if and when this happens.
  5. Beware of people who pretend to call from the Tuluva asking for your user Ids and passwords to login to your account. Please note that Tuluva Team Members never ask you for user password information either on phone or in person.
  6. Never share your financial details like bank account number, online banking credentials, credit card details etc. and be wary of those who ask for money from you. Use sound judgement and do not take any decision in a hurry.
  7. All due diligence efforts and initiatives must be exercised by those who are wishing to use any information found on the website, and they should take adequate precautions with the full and complete knowledge that all information contained on the site have been placed there directly by visitors on the website without any prior intimation, consent or verification of or by Tuluva.

Tuluva – is intended only to serve as a preliminary medium of contact and information and does not portray itself as a business bureau and does not, in any manner whatsoever, monitor the first or subsequent contacts, introductions and/or interactions which may be caused due to any information specified in its contents.

It is made very clear that any advice, counseling, recommendations or information provided at Tuluva may not necessarily be correct, true or reliable, and that any reliance placed thereon and any action taken on the basis of the same shall be solely and entirely at the risk of the person or persons placing such reliance or action on the basis of such reliance taking advantage of, at their own initiative, cost and effort. Tuluva cannot be held responsible or liable, in any manner whatsoever, in respect of any reliance placed on any information laid on this website, since it serves merely to act as an indicator of the general scenario of the matters so related.

The contents at Tuluva are neither intended nor meant to induce or persuade or convince or invite any person whatsoever to perform any action or do any such thing, or not do the same, where such performance or doing, or non-performance or not doing, which would constitute  contravention of any law or regulation for the time being subjected to which such person or action may be subject.